Martinez-Perez v. Ashcroft, 417
F.3d 1022 (9th Cir. Aug. 2, 2005) (California conviction for
grand theft by taking property from the person of another,
in violation of Penal Code § 487(c), is not an aggravated
felony under INA § 101(a)(43)(G), 8 U.S.C.

Penuliar v.
Ashcroft, 395 F.3d 1037 (9th Cir. Jan. 12, 2005) (California
conviction of unlawful driving or taking a vehicle, in violation
of Vehicle Code § 10851(a), was not a theft offense, within
the meaning of INA § 101(a)(43)(G), 8 U.S.C.

Martinez-Perez v. Ashcroft, 393
F.3d 1018 (9th Cir. Dec. 29, 2004) (California conviction
for grand theft by taking property from the person of another,
in violation of Penal Code § 487(c), constitutes a theft offense,
and therefore is an aggravated felony under INA § 101(a)(43)(G),
8 U.S.C.

Patel v. Ashcroft, 294 F.3d 465 (3d Cir. June 20,
2002) (federal conviction of harboring an undocumented noncitizen,
in violation of INA § 101(a)(1)(A), 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A),
met the definition of an "aggravated felony" under
INA § 101(a)(43)(N), 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(N), for immigration
purposes, despite the fact that defendant had no part in the
harbored persons illegal admission or entry).

Gavilan-Cuate v. Yetter, 276 F.3d 418 (8th Cir.
Jan. 9, 2002) (federal conviction of conspiracy to transport
and harbor illegal aliens, in violation of INA §§ 274(a)(1)(A)(ii)
and (iii), 8 U.S.C. §§ 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) and (iii), constituted
aggravated felony under INA § 101(a)(43)(N), 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(N),
despite parenthetical mentioning smuggling).

Castro-Espinosa v. Ashcroft, 257 F.3d 1130 (9th
Cir. July 17, 2001) (federal conviction of harboring illegal
aliens in violation of INA § 274(a)(1)(A)(iii), 8 U.S.C. §
1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) is an "aggravated felony," under
INA § 101(a)(43)(N), 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(N), for removal
purposes).

United States v. Martinez-Candejas, 347 F.3d 853
(10th Cir. Oct. 21, 2003) (federal conviction: aggravated
felony category of alien smuggling includes transportation
and harboring for purposes of 16-level enhancement of illegal
re-entry sentence under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(vii) (2002)
based on prior aggravated felony conviction).

Rivera-Sanchez v. Reno, 198 F.3d
545 (5th Cir. Dec. 30, 1999) (federal illegal entry conviction
of violating INA § 275(a), 8 U.S.C. § 1325(a) is outside the
ambit of INA § 101(a)(43)(N), 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(N), which
is explicitly confined to convictions under INA § 274(a),
8 U.S.C. § 1324(a), and so is not an aggravated felony under
that theory for immigration purposes).

United States v. Cornelio-Pena, 435 F.3d
1279 (10th Cir. Jan. 30, 2006) (Arizona conviction of solicitation
to commit second-degree burglary of a dwelling, in violation
of Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-1002, 1507, is a crime of violence
under U.S.S.G.

Nguyen v. Ashcroft,
366 F.3d 386 (5th Cir. Apr. 26, 2004) (Oklahoma conviction
for facilitation of a drive-by shooting, under 21 Okl.St.Ann.
§ 652, subd. B., constituted a crime of violence aggravated
felony for deportation purposes).